Home | Live Now! |  Try it Now
New America's Christina Larson on China's Environmental Paradox
 
11:44
Fred Barbash-Moderator -  Our guest today is Christina Larson of the New America Foundation. As Barack Obama embarks on his first trip to Beijing as president -- and with less than a month to go before the Copenhagen climate change summit -- it's worth asking: Is China's rapid economic growth ravaging the environment? Or are that nation's massive investments in green technology an environmental lifeline -- not to mention a huge headstart in a sector that could drive the economy of the 21st century?

We'll start at noon. You're invited to submit questions in advance.

11:45
11:46
Fred Barbash-Moderator -  From a recent op-ed by Christina: "

Two years ago, the New York Times reported that China was "choking on growth," with rapid economic development ravaging its environment. But in a recent column, the Times' Tom Friedman declared that "Red China [has] decided to become Green China," writing that the developing country now outpaces the United States in its pursuit of alternative energy.

The Times example illustrates the schism in how the West regards China on the environment. One side argues that China is a pure environmental villain -- the biggest emitter of greenhouse gases and an unmatched polluter. So, this case goes, the U.S. Congress shouldn't commit to capping carbon emissions when Beijing hasn't accepted binding reduction targets. The other side contends that China is already so far ahead of the United States in green technology that Americans should be trembling for their jobs, not to mention their competitive edge in the global marketplace.

On the eve of Obama's first trip to Beijing and with less than a month to go before the United Nations climate change summit in Copenhagen, it's time to think again: Is China the green model of the future, or the brown reminder of our industrial past?"

12:00
Fred Barbash-Moderator -  Welcome POLITICO readers and readers coming in from the NAF site. This POLITICO-NAF chat is a regular weekly feature. We're glad to have you here.

Welcome Christina. Before geting to reader questions, let me begin by asking you about the latest news about Copenhagen...or non-news..that it's now "official' that there won't be a formal agreement. So what will happen there and what's the next step?
12:01
[Comment From Christina Larson]
Alas, you are correct ...
12:01
[Comment From Christina Larson]
During the recent APEC meeting, Obama joined other world leaders in announcing that a binding legal agreement on climate change would not be reached at Copenhagen ...
12:02
[Comment From Christina Larson]
The most difficult questions -- about binding carbon emissions targets, and who will pay for mitigation efforts -- will be punted into the future. There's word of a future meeting in Mexico next year.
12:03
[Comment From Christina Larson]
It's a disappointment, but not really a surprise.
    Page 1  Next >
 
Powered by: CoveritLive  Reader Information