Home | Live Now! |  Try it Now
Arena Live
 
11:59
Fred Barbash-Moderator -  The question for today is: "Will you miss your newspaper when (and if) it disappears?" It's prompted, of course, by the fact that some 50 newspapers have closed in the past 18 months; more will follow; others are downsizing dramatically through buyouts (For the record, I am a buyout from the Washington Post) and most were losing money long before the economic crisis we're in now, and are in worse shape since. Many believe web-based news--or news perhaps delivered on handheld devices, will adequately replace newspapers. For me, the issue is not the survival of news organizations....It's well-funded news organizations fully staffed by professionals. Few if any purely web-based publications have found a formula to make the kind of money it takes to replicate the quality of coverage provided by newspapers. Surely some will; we hope POLITICO is one of them. But it could take some time.

Many harbor anger and resentment at what they consider the bias of newspapers. I understand that. But in their anger they may be overlooking the real service papers provide to local communities and local democracy...from obituaries to exposing local corruption to covering local teams.

How will this be replaced? What do you think?
12:01
[Comment From david a d]
i well miss newspapers especially on Sunday's. they are the best place to read differing viewpoints
12:03
[Comment From david a d]
also if newspapers die what well that do to the pundit industry?
12:03
[Comment From Jen]
I think some of the arena contributors have pointed out that there are already plenty of alternatives to the traditional newspaper. All things change..
12:04
Fred Barbash-Moderator -  I think Rosabeth Moss Kanter of the Harvard Business School made a similar point on Arena Jen:

Here we are blathering on Politico.com about the future of news? How truly ironic

 While advertising-supported, environment-unfriendly news papers shrink, the Internet keeps opinion and information flowing freely, making our democracy noisier than ever and thus more robust. The press is no longer the printing press. Reporting the news is being unbundled from publishing it, and new models are developing at both ends of the spectrum: expert journalists becoming content providers (e.g., check out GlobalPost, my friend Charlie Sennott’s new foreign correspondent service) and anyone with a video camera or a cell phone providing content to the New York Times – and their Twitter buddies.

Sure, a for-profit newspaper that wants to convert itself into a non-profit should be able to do so under laws governing non-profits, but that won’t solve the newspaper problem, unless they offer so much value that people will make voluntary charitable contributions to make up for losses – even non-profits can’t run with constant deficits. If they create that much value compared to other media, they would not have the viability problem. So one way or another, newspapers need new strategic models, regardless of their financial structures.
12:05
[Comment From Dave]
Isn't the bias of newspapers (and Web sites, for that matter) what drives people to read them?
12:05
[Comment From Cris]
The pundit industry will be alive and well on TV.
12:05
[Comment From Sam]
One of the people at the forefront of the "future of the news" discussion is NYU Journalism professor Jay Rosen. He put together what he calls a flying seminar: http://is.gd/p1t9 Might be worth a read...
12:05
Fred Barbash-Moderator -  Cris: I think the pundit industry is thriving; It's the news industry that's in trouble.
12:06
Fred Barbash-Moderator -  Sam: I've seeen that Rosen project. It's well worth a look.
    Page 1  Next >
 
Powered by: CoveritLive  Reader Information