Home | Live Now! | Try it Now
Chat with Rick Santorum
 
11:08
Fred Barbash-Moderator -  Good morning and thanks for participating. Former U.S. Sen. Rick Santorum will be joining us for approximately 40 minutes starting at noon EDT. You're invited to submit questions in advance as well as during the Q and A. As always, please give a name with your question, rather than a handle or "guest."

Next week, at noon on May 4, our guest will be Howard Dean
11:57
Fred Barbash-Moderator -  Welcome Senator Santorum. Thanks for being with us today. There are a lot of questions for our 40 minute session already so let's get going.

11:57
[Comment From Jen]
Thanks for doing this chat Senator. How would you assess the Republican leadership these days in Washington? Do you think they are an effective opposition to Obama, Pelosi and Reid?
11:59
[Comment From Rick Santorum ]
Jen, right now i think they are in opposition mode only with so much coming at them so quickly they have not been able to craft an effective counter strategy, much less implement it. Hopefully, that process is underway.
11:59
[Comment From Alan]
Do you have any plans to run for office again any time soon?
12:02
[Comment From Rick Santorum ]
Alan, thank you for your question, but right now i am focused on providing for seven young children who starting this year are entering the college years. I hope to stay active and vocal in the short term and leave my options open beyond that.
12:03
[Comment From Steven]
You've had some pretty strong things to say in your column about Obama's foreign policies, yet you wrote that basically his policies are "downright Bushian." How do you reconcile this?
12:05
[Comment From Rick Santorum ]
Steven, that was the point of my column you really can't reconcile Obama's actions in Iraq and Afghanistan (which are a contiuation of Bush policies) and his weak rhetoric and behavior on the diplomatic front.
12:06
[Comment From George]
Who would you rank as the leading contenders for the Republican presidential nomination in 2012? Are you interested?
12:09
[Comment From Rick Santorum ]
George, I learned early in politics to never say never, but i intend to travel to Iowa and NH to speak into the debate as to the future direction of the party - like i do with my columns and Fox News, but not planning on a campaign this time around
12:10
Fred Barbash-Moderator -  Senator. Sen. Spector is now announcing that he's switching parties. Here's the release:
I have been a Republican since 1966. I have been working extremely hard for the Party, for its candidates and for the ideals of a Republican Party whose tent is big enough to welcome diverse points of view. While I have been comfortable being a Republican, my Party has not defined who I am. I have taken each issue one at a time and have exercised independent judgment to do what I thought was best for Pennsylvania and the nation.

Since my election in 1980, as part of the Reagan Big Tent, the Republican Party has moved far to the right. Last year, more than 200,000 Republicans in Pennsylvania changed their registration to become Democrats. I now find my political philosophy more in line with Democrats than Republicans.

When I supported the stimulus package, I knew that it would not be popular with the Republican Party. But, I saw the stimulus as necessary to lessen the risk of a far more serious recession than we are now experiencing.

Since then, I have traveled the State, talked to Republican leaders and office-holders and my supporters and I have carefully examined public opinion. It has become clear to me that the stimulus vote caused a schism which makes our differences irreconcilable. On this state of the record, I am unwilling to have my twenty-nine year Senate record judged by the Pennsylvania Republican primary electorate. I have not represented the Republican Party. I have represented the people of Pennsylvania.

I have decided to run for re-election in 2010 in the Democratic primary.

I am ready, willing and anxious to take on all comers and have my candidacy for re-election determined in a general election.

I deeply regret that I will be disappointing many friends and supporters. I can understand their disappointment. I am also disappointed that so many in the Party I have worked for for more than four decades do not want me to be their candidate. It is very painful on both sides. I thank specially Senators McConnell and Cornyn for their forbearance.

I am not making this decision because there are no important and interesting opportunities outside the Senate. I take on this complicated run for re-election because I am deeply concerned about the future of our country and I believe I have a significant contribution to make on many of the key issues of the day, especially medical research. NIH funding has saved or lengthened thousands of lives, including mine, and much more needs to be done. And my seniority is very important to continue to bring important projects vital to Pennsylvania’s economy.

I am taking this action now because there are fewer than thirteen months to the 2010 Pennsylvania Primary and there is much to be done in preparation for that election. Upon request, I will return campaign contributions contributed during this cycle.

While each member of the Senate caucuses with his Party, what each of us hopes to accomplish is distinct from his party affiliation. The American people do not care which Party solves the problems confronting our nation. And no Senator, no matter how loyal he is to his Party, should or would put party loyalty above his duty to the state and nation.

My change in party affiliation does not mean that I will be a party-line voter any more for the Democrats that I have been for the Republicans. Unlike Senator Jeffords’ switch which changed party control, I will not be an automatic 60th vote for cloture. For example, my position on Employees Free Choice (Card Check) will not change.

Whatever my party affiliation, I will continue to be guided by President Kennedy’s statement that sometimes Party asks too much. When it does, I will continue my independent voting and follow my conscience on what I think is best for Pennsylvania and America.


12:12
Fred Barbash-Moderator -  Senator. Arlen Specter has just announced that he's going to run as a Democrat in 2010. What is your reaction?
12:15
[Comment From Rick Santorum ]
I spoke with Arlen this morning and he explained his reasoning to me. I told him I was deeply disappointed that he felt he had to do it. It is a huge blow to the Republican's ability to moderate any of Obama's very liberal proposals. I can only hope that Arlen will be as independent as a Democrat as he has been as a Republican.
12:16
[Comment From Janeth]
With Republicans in Washington becoming the party of no is there anything that you would say yes to about Obama's policies besides Afghanistan. Health care maybe? Any type of domestic policy? That pandemic flu program now seems useful?
12:20
[Comment From Rick Santorum ]
Janeth, Well the pandemic response program was put in place by the previous administration and i fully supported it. Obviously, we should be able to work together and work on this pandemic, but the big problem with Obama is his policies are almost uniformly hard left - from nationalized health care to dramatically increasing the size and scope of government.
12:20
Fred Barbash-Moderator -  Sen. Santorum can only take this last question I'm afraid. He's got to go--unexpected news--and he's getting swamped. He has promised to come back again and talk to us. He apologizes to all of you whose questions he could not take...

Thank you so much Senator.

12:21
Fred Barbash-Moderator -  If readers would like to continue this as a chat, please do so...there's suddenly breaking political news from Pennsylvanians.
12:24
[Comment From Aaron Rabinowitz]
Sen. Specter just made the boldest political move of any representative in months. He deserves major props for that I think.
12:24
[Comment From Carl]
Good riddance! He started his career as a Dem and we'll make sure he ends it as one.
    Page 1  Next >
 
Powered by: CoveritLive  Reader Information